The Lost Language of Cranes
Netflix | Amazon
Overall Rating: 4/10
Meets Expectations: -2
Apparent Rating: 2/10
Somewhere there are people who intended this to be a good movie with an involving story and coherent allusions and great acting. Those people are probably ashamed of what this movie became. It isn’t quite that bad, but there was all this intellectual stuff about children who are raised without parental influence end up speaking their own languages (the “lost language of cranes” is about a toddler who modeled his communication off building cranes because he didn’t interact with people.) But there is no clear association between this lost language and how a gay man learns to find his way in the world.
The production values on this DVD are terrible. It looks like someone ported the VHS to DVD. The subtitles are mediocre and necessary because it manages to sound even more foreign than the English setting would imply.
Anyone considering viewing this movie should be aware that there is brief but full view male frontal nudity. There is no real sex, very little physical interaction at all, but at one point a man gets out of bed and walks toward the camera with everything showing.
The beginning of the movie seems to be about the relationship between Philip and Eliott. But the movie’s summary says it’s about Philip and his father. It also seems like it’s about Eliott and his roommate who is the sociologist. And it seems like it’s about Philip’s father and mother. And about Philip and his new love after Eliott deserts him. There is no clear thread connecting these stories what-so-ever.
Philip’s mother is one of those disgusting cows who thinks everything is about her house while she’s having an affair and her husband is leaving her for another man. But the way it’s shown, we’re supposed to feel sorry for her because everyone else is progressing and she’s been left behind. I do agree that the ability for people to openly express their sexual preferences is progress, but I do not agree that being homosexual is better than being heterosexual, so that cannot be thought to be progress inherently.
We are also supposed to feel sorry for Philip’s father because he’s been a closeted homosexual for more than 20 years. Mostly though it seems like something he’s brought on himself by dishonesty. No one forced him to marry a woman and ruin her life too.
I don’t know where Eliott fit into things, except he was a gay man raised by two gay men and still managed to destroy his relationship with Philip. And Eliott’s roommate, the sociologist woman, suddenly bags her whole thesis near the end of the movie for no apparent reason except the movie is ending and she wants to be able to go out with Philip and his new love.
For the people writing the screenplay, please to be remembering not to put the plot and characters in the blender and taking out chunks at random. This movie was not worth watching, but throughout there were glimmers of movies which might have been fabulous.